Susceptibilité d'appartenance à un groupe sanguin spécifique du système Abo des personnes atteintes de COVID-19 à l'Institut national de Santé Publique (INSP) en 2020 / Susceptibility of ABOS blood groups to COVID-19 at the National Institute of Public Health (INSP) Of Mali In 2020

Introduction: Plusieurs auteurs ont suggéré une association entre le système ABO (SABO) et le risque d'infection au SRAS CoV-2. La présente étude avait pour objectif d'identifier la susceptibilité des groupes sanguins du SABO au COVID-19à l'Institut National de Santé Publique (INSP) du Mali. Matériel et méthodes : Il s'agissait une étude cas-témoins non appariée. Les cas (402) étaient des patients COVID-19 et les témoins (5438) des pèlerins musulmans tous ayant fait le groupage sanguin ABO à l'INSP. Une régression logistique fut réalisée afin d'identifier les facteurs associés au statut infectieux à SRAS-CoV-2en utilisant le logiciel SPSS version25. Résultats: Les groupes sanguins avaient les fréquences suivantes : O(34%), B(30%), A(28%), AB(8%) pour les cas et O(42%), B(27%), A(25%), AB(6%) pour les témoins. Le statut COVID-19 positif n'était pas significativement associé aux groupes sanguins A(OR=1,17; IC95%[0,93-1,47]), B(OR=1,11; IC95%[0,89-1,39]) et AB(OR=1,41; IC95%[0,97-2,06]). Cependant, les sujets du groupe sanguin O étaient 28 fois moins susceptibles de faire la COVID-19 que les non O(OR=0,72; IC95%[0,58-0,89). Conclusion: Les résultats suggèrent que les personnes du groupe sanguin O étaient moins susceptibles de faire l'infection par le SRAS CoV-2 que les non O. Cela ne devrait pas influer sur l'utilisation des mesures barrières au sein des groupes SABO.

Introduction: Several authors have suggested an association between the ABO system (ABOS) and the risk of SARS CoV-2 infection. The objective of the present study was to identify the susceptibility of ABOS blood groups to COVID-19 at the National Institute of Public Health (INSP) of Mali. Material and methods: This was an unpaired case-control study. The cases (402) were COVID-19 patients, and the controls (5438) were Muslim pilgrims, all of whom had undergone ABO blood grouping at the INSP. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection status using SPSS version25 software. Results: Blood types had the following frequencies: O(34%), B(30%), A(28%), AB(8%) for cases and O(42%), B(27%), A(25%), AB(6%) for controls. COVID-19 positive status was not significantly associated with blood groups A(OR=1.17; CI95%[0.93-1.47]), B(OR=1.11; CI95%[0.89-1.39]) and AB(OR=1.41; CI95%[0.97-2.06]). However, blood group O subjects were 28 times less likely to have COVID-19 than non-O(OR=0.72; CI95%[0.58-0.89). Conclusion: The results show that blood group O individuals were less likely to have SARS CoV-2 infection than non-O individuals. This should not affect the use of barrier measures in ABOS groups.

Educating caregivers to recognise the clinical signs of pneumonia in children younger than 6 months

Background. Pneumonia remains the foremost cause of death in young children in sub-Saharan Africa. This phenomenon is largely driven by poor access to healthcare and delay in seeking medical care for childhood pneumonia. Objective. To assess the effectiveness of training caregivers to recognise the early clinical signs of pneumonia. Methods. The study involved a cohort of women presenting to the Child Welfare Clinic at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana, between 7 July and 8 September 2016. A total of 90 women with children younger than 10 weeks were recruited. Participants were trained on identifying early signs of pneumonia using low-cost equipment. Follow-up training and assessment sessions formed part of the programme.Results. At pre-training assessment, the majority of the participants (n=83/90; 92.2%) recognised lower chest indrawing as a sign of respiratory disease requiring immediate hospital intervention. Participants' performance in determining rhythms of 50 breaths per minute (bpm) and 60 bpm improved significantly across sessions (p=0.011 and p≤0.001, respectively). After training, 87 participants (96.7%) were able to determine rapid breathing accurately compared with 73 participants (81.1%) before training (p=0.001).Conclusion. The results suggest that caregivers can be effectively trained to identify clinical signs of pneumonia in young children, even in low-resource settings. A training initiative as described in this study could be an effective public health intervention to help address the burden of pneumonia in low-resource settings